Module 1 - Map Critique

 For Module 1 we were asked to choose two maps to critique. We will be reviewing the overall map design as well as the presence of basic map elements used to create a useful map.

The first is my choice of a well-designed map:

I chose this example of a well-designed map because it shows the intended information in a clean, concise manner. The Map Title is present and well-placed giving the user a distinct purpose for this map. The color scheme used is visually appealing as it shows contrasting colors without being overwhelming. The other map elements present such as the legend, scale bar, and north arrow are appropriately placed and useful in utilizing this map. This map includes the agency responsible for the information presented and when it was created. It also includes information to access additional resources.  Overall, I find this map to be well-presented and useful in conveying the intended information. 

The second map I chose is an example of a poorly-designed map:

I chose this example as a poorly-designed map because at first glance it is very overwhelming and almost anxiety-inducing. The first thing I noticed about this map is that the title is present but very poorly placed. It wasn’t until I found the entire title that I was able to determine what information the map was trying to present. The main issue I have with this map is the amount of information that was, for lack of a better term, crammed into the map frame. Of course, I don’t know the original purpose of this map but if I had to present this information I think this map could be cleared up a lot and be used with supplemental information not included within the map frame. The overuse of text blocks takes up so much space there is not any room for basic map elements such as a north arrow or scale bar. There is something of a legend present but it does not define the map features well. Overall, this map was not well-designed and tries to present too much information in a limited area.